Planet Lean: The Official online magazine of the Lean Global Network
Adopting lean principles to speed up blood donation

Adopting lean principles to speed up blood donation

Morena Venturini and Francesca Marchi
March 10, 2017

FEATURE – In the second article of our lean healthcare series by the front-line staff of Siena University Hospital, we learn how the principles of pull and flow have transformed the blood donating process.


Words: Morena Venturini, Manager of the Professional Operating Unit of Laboratory Diagnostics, and Francesca Marchi, Technician, Lean Office AOU Senese


In 2015, our facilities received 4,415 blood donations – welcoming, on average, 33 donors per day – and produced around 14,533 units of blood and blood products. Unfortunately, due to the faulty process we had in place, people had to endure very long waits to donate blood.

As the complaints kept pouring in, the immunohaematology and tranfusion medicine team decided to turn to lean thinking, which was already present (and thriving) in many other parts of our organization, in a bid to shorten waiting times and hopefully offer a better service to our donors.

In January 2016, we initiated a seven-month project called "If blood doesn't flow," with the help of our Lean Office.

We started by assessing our performance, measuring lead-time and donor flow for two weeks. We found that, expectedly, the average length-of-stay (LT) varied depending on the type of donor we received: donations on appointment took an average of 81 minutes to complete, while drop-in donors tended to wait 117 minutes on average (with a peak of 270 minutes). No wonder they were complaining!

The analysis of the data revealed that the length-of-stay markedly increased in the first few hours of the day and towards the end of the week (the times when most donors showed up at our doors).

Many of the people working in our ward stressed that the solution to this problem would be to increase the number of donating chairs, but when we looked at their occupancy rate we found that it was a mere 39.8%. The problem had to be elsewhere. So we decided to map the donors' flow using value stream mapping.

It became apparent that the bottleneck was right before the medical examination: after a preliminary blood sample was taken, donors were asked to go back to the waiting room until the clinic was able to welcome them back. Our work appeared fragmented, chaotic and full of unnecessary interruptions.

The team aimed to immediately reduce the waiting time for planned donations, to ensure the appointment time donors were given corresponded to the actual time of donation. We expected this (together with a campaign we ran to increase awareness) to incentivize more people to choose to book an appointment rather than drop in to donate, thus reducing the variability we experienced.

With a final goal of reducing the waiting time by at least 20%, we introduced a number of improvements to the way we organize the donor's path. Appointments are now scheduled avoiding any sort of overlapping or interference with other patients' paths (like transplants, for instance), and we use a visual board with a kanban card for each donor to regulate their flow.

The change that did most to improve the way we manage flow, however, was the introduction of a pull system: the donor is called into the blood exam room when the previous donor goes in to see the doctor, so that we only have one donor flowing along the path at any given time, without interruption or ever going back to the waiting room. Each step now pulls the following one, and the bottleneck has disappeared.

The reorganization of donors' flow, which was supported by a change in the layout of the admissions office and the waiting room, brought us great results (with no additional resources invested): each year, our donors don't have to wait as much as they used to and walk a staggering 372 kilometers less than before. Our people have also told us how much easier their work has become, and how stress has decreased in the ward. That's what we call a win-win!


THE AUTHORS

Morena Venturini is manager of the Professional Operating Unit of Laboratory Diagnostics at Siena University Hospital
Francesca Marchi is a technician in the Lean Office at Siena University Hospital

Read more

John Shook on failure, innovation and the resilience of lean
January 17, 2017
John Shook on failure, innovation and the resilience of lean

INTERVIEW – In this must-read Q&A, our editor sits down with lean guru John Shook to discuss the meaning of failure, the nature of innovation, and the resilience of our movement.

Continue reading
Monozukuri, Hitozukuri, Kotozukuri
January 8, 2019
Monozukuri, Hitozukuri, Kotozukuri

RESEARCH – The authors present a new perspective on value creation. In addition to monozukuri (making things) and hitozukuri (making people), they discuss the idea of kotozukuri, making things happen.

Continue reading
Better thinking for better lean thinking
February 7, 2019
Better thinking for better lean thinking

FEATURE – We tend to describe lean as a holistic approach to a transformation, but we won’t be able to truly embrace it until everyone starts to see the organization as a system.

Continue reading
Why lean thinking is the engine of a digital transformation
February 23, 2016
Why lean thinking is the engine of a digital transformation

FEATURE – The goal of your digital transformation is not only to develop new technologies and innovative processes, but to turn your people into the kind of "smart creatives" who will lead your firm into the future. Lean will get you there.

Continue reading

Read more

No items found.